MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C8A15E.D5168600" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C8A15E.D5168600 Content-Location: file:///C:/1D29BA38/p03-12-08.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN OF ELLICOTT PLANNING BOARD HELD AT THE
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 215 SOUTH WORK STREET, FALCONER, NY 14733 ON MARCH=
12,
2008 AT 7:00 P.M.
PRESENT:=
Chairman Dan Evans, Ga=
ry Swanson,
Ron Calanni, Paul Shanahan, Steve Peterson, Fred Santucci, Attorney William
Wright, Code Enforcement Officer Randy Woodbury and Secretary Valerie Pierc=
e
ABSENT: Phyllis Belin
Chairman Evans opened the meeting at 7:00 PM.
Motion made by Steve Peterson, seconded by Ronald
Calanni to approve the minutes of the January 9, 2008 meeting.
Carried. =
&nb=
sp; Ayes
– 6 =
&nb=
sp;
Noes – 0
=
&nb=
sp; Absent
– 1
Chairman Evans opened the Public Hearing for Ant=
hony
and Richard Benedetto for the construction of a new office building on
Attorney Wright said t=
hat
the Town Board has considered rezoning of this property at the recommendati=
on
of the Planning Board. They d=
id not
take action at the request of Mr. Wright because the SEQR involved in the
rezoning is a project specific SEQR and it had been decided that the SEQR w=
ould
be done by the Planning Board. The findings could be adopted by the Town Bo=
ard.
This property is not yet properly zoned but cannot stop this review.
Mr. Richard Benedetto
reviewed the project for the Board.
Mr. Paul Potter, engineer, had provided site plans.
The Planning Board
reviewed the plans submitted noting:
=
1)&n=
bsp;
Drainage – water will drain to the =
road
ditch – there is a 2 foot swale going around the property - the Board members had a lot if
questions and concerns on the drainage – there will be no water going
into the ditch and all the water will be confined to the property
=
2)&n=
bsp;
Elevations – the building is 1364 t=
otal
feet - the Board requested elevation drawings be submitted
=
3)&n=
bsp;
the gravel driveway entrance is at baseme=
nt
level and the elevation is at 1355’
=
4)&n=
bsp;
total site acreage - a total of .93 acres=
=
5)&n=
bsp;
lighting – there will be one light
pole, 3 lights on the front of the building and a couple of man door lights=
on
the back of the building for security
=
6)&n=
bsp;
there will be a dumpster – the Board
wanted the placement shown on the plan and requested that the dumpster be
fenced in
The Board had a lengthy
discussion on the drainage. T=
here were
no topals on the one side to show the Board that the water would not go onto
the neighbor’s property.
There seems to be only a 2 foot drop, which the Board thought would =
not
be enough in a 100 year storm. Attorney Goodell said that the Board wanted =
to
keep in mind that the volume of the swale is based on the width as well as =
its
drop. Mr. Evans said there is=
a lot
of existing water there. Mr.
Goodell stated that if it overflowed it would overflow into the creek. The
Board would like the water contained on site. The applicant agreed to put a one =
foot
berm to protect the neighbors. Steve Carlson, licensed land surveyor, revie=
wed
the contours for the Board. T=
hey
had no calculations for a 100 year storm. Mr. Carlson said that Paul Potter=
did
not calculate them because it was not required for a site under one acre. T=
he
letter received from the County Planning Board stated they had concerns on =
the
drainage. Mr. Evans stated the
Board would like to see calculations and a better plan showing the drainage=
.
Attorney Wright review=
ed
section 146-24 of the code, which states that wherever a neighborhood busin=
ess
abuts a residential area you are required to have a buffer zone that consis=
t of
20 feet of trees, shrubs, hedges or a combination thereof. The idea is to have a vegetative b=
uffer
between the building and the neighboring residential buildings. The drainage plan would preclude t=
hat
buffer.
The Planning Board
reviewed the site plan checklist noting:
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>1)&n=
bsp;
the property is treed and they plan on
keeping as many trees as they can
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>2)&n=
bsp;
storm water management plan was not compl=
ete
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>3)&n=
bsp;
exterior dimensions were not noted on the
plan
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>4)&n=
bsp;
building is 4000 SF – there is a
basement under 2/3 of the building and a crawl space under the part of the
building facing
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>5)&n=
bsp;
Randy stated they would need a full set of
architectural plans to apply for their building permit
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>6)&n=
bsp;
there is a driveway that is gravel but
because it is an integral part of the storm water management plan it is a
reasonable rational to waive it being bituminous – it in not the
principal use driveway or where they will have customer parking – it
would be used only once a week – it would be low use and have no rout=
ine
parking
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>7)&n=
bsp;
the applicant has to locate the dumpster =
on
the plan
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>8)&n=
bsp;
there will be no fences except around the
dumpster
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>9)&n=
bsp;
the retaining wall would be poured concre=
te
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>10)&=
nbsp; they
will hook up to City of
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>11)&=
nbsp; the
closest fire hydrant is down
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>12)&=
nbsp; overhead
electric service will come in=
to the
building
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>13)&=
nbsp; buffers
must meet the regulations in section 146-24 C of the code
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>14)&=
nbsp; there
will be no retail sales
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>15)&=
nbsp; landscaping
– Mr. Benedetto said they could easily put in some maple or pine tree=
s in
the swale area and he did not think it would interfere with the swale ̵=
1;
Mr. Wright said that pine trees are a great buffer
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>16)&=
nbsp; their
estimated project construction schedule – Mr. Benedetto said with
approval tonight they would hope it to be May 31st
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>17)&=
nbsp; their
driveway access will need approval from the County
Chairman Evans listed =
the
items that the Board needs for the approval of this project:
=
7)&n=
bsp;
storm water calculations – the engi=
neer
has told Mr. Woodbury it is under the square footage of needing a storm wat=
er
plan – the Board wants a certification letter from the engineer that =
in a
100 year storm they are going to contain the water on site
=
8)&n=
bsp;
the square footage and the lighting needs=
to
be put on the site plan
=
9)&n=
bsp;
the Board will waive the bituminous surfa=
ce
for the driveway that will have low usage and would not have any routine
parking
11)the
dumpster needs to be on the site plan and be fenced in
13)the
location of sewer needs to be on the plan
14)
the location of water needs to be on the site plan
17) the location of the sign=
needs
to be noted on the plan
18) the landscaping needs to=
be in
conformance with section 146-24 C
19) the lighting needs to be=
put
on the site plan
21)need a landscaping plan f=
or the
buffering – engineer can attach to the site plan
23) the Town needs a copy of=
the
permit for the driveway from the County
The Board will have to=
do
the SEQR when they bring the site plan back.
Mr. Benedetto asked if=
the
Planning Board could approve this subject to the Town Board reviewing the s=
ite
plan. Chairman Evans stated t=
hat
the Town Board cannot approve a site plan.=
Attorney Wright said the Planning Board is not on a time frame for t=
he
SEQR from the Town Board. Att=
orney
Goodell said they do have a real time problem with the tenant and asked if =
this
could move any faster than another month and a half. The applicant wants occupancy by M=
ay 31st. It might take 30 days longer but t=
hey
are shooting for May 31st.
The Board could consider a special meeting. The Town Board meets on April 7
Attorney Wright sugges=
ted
that they get the plan done and get it reviewed by Mr. Woodbury and the Boa=
rd
could call for a special meeting.
Randy said it does not look like the Town Board will be able to act =
on March
17th but they possibly could on April 7th. He suggested the Planning Board co=
uld
meet on April 2nd and would be ahead of the first Town Board mee=
ting
in April. The tentative date =
for
the next Planning Board meeting is April 2, 2008.
Motion made by Ron Calanni, seconded by Steve
Peterson to table this application for Richard and Anthony Benedetto pending
additional information.
Carried. =
&nb=
sp;
Ayes – 6 &nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp;
Noes – 0 &nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp;
Absent – 1
Chairman Evans opened the Public Hearing for
Jamestown Macadam Inc. for site plan review to replace the current plant and
building with a new plant and building.
Mr. Tom Olson, Vice President, submitted
site plans. He had plans of t=
he
existing site and plans for the new site. Mr. Paul Potter is the engineer for=
this
project.
Randy Woodbury explain=
ed
the project. The current owne=
r is
Jamestown Macadam and they want to update the technology without shutting d=
own
the existing plant. They have=
a
plan to build the new plant next to the old plant and demolish the old
one. Mr. Olson said they will=
not
demolish the old building. He=
said
the plant itself is completely enclosed with a building for the purpose of =
making
concrete in the winter. They
originally erected the plant 30 or 40 years ago and then put the building
around it. Mr. Olson explained the operation of the plant to the Board
members. Mr. Olson said they =
cannot
stop business and so their plan is to run the old plant while they construct
the one next to it. Once the =
get
the plant erected and running they would put the building around it. They plan to shut down on a long w=
eekend
and replace the conveyor and have it done in 3 or 4 days.
Discussion followed on=
if
these plans would be a modification to the original site plan but this prop=
erty
has never had a site plan review so it can not be a modification. Dan Evans said they would not be
changing any traffic patterns, no outdoor storage, or any topals. Attorney
Wright stated they are not changing any impervious surface, which is the mo=
st
important issue. The storm wa=
ter
plan was done in 2004 and filed in
Mr. Olson said they ca=
nnot
use the current plant. The on=
ly
permit they need is the existing storm water permit. There are topals on the
plan. Mr. Olson said there is=
a
storm water prevention plan that had been done recently by George Marshall =
that
is required for their SPEDES permit.
Mr. Olson did have a copy to show the Board and Randy copied it for =
the
Town.
The water supply is
through the City of
The Board went though =
the
site plan checklist noting:
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>1)&n=
bsp;
they have a stamped drawing
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>2)&n=
bsp;
plan has north arrow - plan is 1 in 40 fe=
et
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>3)&n=
bsp;
need dimensions on the boundaries of the =
property
that are plotted
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>4)&n=
bsp;
have existing building
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>5)&n=
bsp;
the site is level
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>6)&n=
bsp;
no existing watercourses or tree masses
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>7)&n=
bsp;
have storm water management plan
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>8)&n=
bsp;
dimensions of buildings plotted
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>9)&n=
bsp;
Mr. Olson showed the Board the traffic pl=
ans
for loading and unloading
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>10)&=
nbsp; no pedestrian access
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>11)&=
nbsp; the
outdoor storage is plotted on plan
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>12)&=
nbsp; no
site improvements for drains culverts retaining walls or fences
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>13)&=
nbsp; location
of sewer
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>14)&=
nbsp; fire
hydrant is on plan
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>15)&=
nbsp; water
is located
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>16)&=
nbsp; location
of gas
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>17)&=
nbsp; there
is a sign on the wall - they will not erect any new signs – they will=
eventually
change the name
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>18)&=
nbsp; no buffer areas
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>19)&=
nbsp; outdoor
lighting –
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>20)&=
nbsp; no
retail sales
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>21)&=
nbsp; landscaping
and planting schedule – Board can waive
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>22)&=
nbsp; estimated
project construction schedule – Mr. Olson said they want to start as =
soon
as the weather will allow
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>23)&=
nbsp; Town
has a copy of the permit required for the storm water
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>24)&=
nbsp; permit
for storm water is only required
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>25)&=
nbsp; none
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>26)&=
nbsp; N/A
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>27)&=
nbsp; Property
is level
<=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-weight:bo=
ld'>28)&=
nbsp; N/A
Chairman Evans listed =
the
items that the Planning Board needs:
3)
Boundaries of the property – stating the dimensions
13)
Location of sewage
14)
location of water
16)
location of gas supply
19)
outdoor lighting
21)
the Board will waive the landscaping since they are in an Industrial zone
Attorney Wright determined that this project is
exempt from SEQR as a type II action under 617.5(C) 7 (construction of a
nonresidential structure involving less than 4000 SF).
Motion made by Paul Shanahan, seconded by Ron
Calanni to table this application until the April 2, 2008 meeting pending
additional information.
Carried. =
Ayes – 6 =
&nb=
sp;
Noes – 0 =
&nb=
sp; =
Absent – 1
Margaret Servoss requested a sketch plan
conference. She wants to cons=
truct
an indoor/outdoor kennel facility for a dog care business and to park a
dog-grooming mobile van at
Attorney Wright explai=
ned
this is an informal meeting for Ms. Servoss.
Ms. Servoss said the
Humane Society is giving dogs to the elderly free of charge and they cannot=
get
the dogs to the groomers so she wants to start a mobile grooming but she al=
so
wants a total plan for them. =
The
way is it now if they are unable to care for the dogs for a short period of
time the dogs have to go back to the SPCA.=
She said it has been proven that when the dogs bond with the owner it
helps them recuperate much faster. She would like to have a temporary holdi=
ng
place while the people are in rehab. She would keep them as her personal pe=
t,
so it is not really a kennel. When
the elderly go into nursing homes for rehab she will be able to take the do=
gs
to visit because they have found that pets offer a great deal to the
elderly.
Ms. Servoss told the B=
oard
she wants to put in a cement slab because the land is very wet. She wants to
park the van without the worry of it sinking in. Behind the garage in the s=
hed
she wants to put a small platform with a little A-frame to hold the dogs wh=
ile
she is out grooming. It will =
have
electric and water and there will be a small play area with a fence. She showed the Board a sketch of h=
er
plan.
Mrs. Servoss said that=
her
closest neighbor is right across the driveway but no one is living there ri=
ght
now. It is a rental property.=
Paul Shanahan showed Ms. Servoss a=
map
of her property he got off the GIS system.=
The neighbor shares a driveway but Ms. Servoss owns the driveway.
Ms. Servoss has not
purchased the van because she wanted to make sure she could do this. It wil=
l be
a full time business. She wou=
ld
only keep dogs for the elderly and she will be picking them up. The grooming will be available to =
anyone
and will be all off site.
Attorney Wright said t=
he
most critical issue for the Planning Board is whether or not this is a use =
that
triggers the site plan review under section 121-5 of the code. Mr. Wright reviewed the section of=
the
code. The other question is i=
f this
is an ordinary related land use to an agriculture-residential district. Is it a change in use? Paul said that even though Ms. Ser=
voss
does not think this is a kennel it might be determined to be and might deem
site plan.
Attorney Wright said
looking just at the dog grooming business they would be talking about a home
occupation. They do not trigg=
er
site plan.
Randy said that he
believes that the closest thing that this would be is a kennel and it would
trigger site plan. Mr. Wright=
said
that the first real determination is for Randy to determine whether it is a=
use
that is permitted under the code under the Agricultural-Residential zone. R=
andy
determined that this is a kennel and needs a Special Use Permit. He feels t=
he
van would be an accessory to the kennel but not necessarily “not
customary”. He would accept that the van could be an accessory to the
kennel. The signage would hav=
e to
be discussed. If she challenges his determination and feels it is a home
occupation she could not have the van because a home occupation is done
completely inside the house.
Ms. Servoss needs to g=
o to
the Zoning Board for a Special Use Permit. The Planning Board needs to
determine if this triggers site plan.
Drainage and water issues are not relevant so they could waive the s=
ite
plan. Mr. Wright told Ms. Ser=
voss
that the criteria for the Special Use Permit are in section 146-64 of the c=
ode.
Randy can then direct the Board if what she is doing requires site plan.
Ms. Servoss will apply=
for
the Special Use Permit. Randy can help her with some photos. The proximity =
of
the neighbors is crucial.
Chad Hebner, d/b/a GamerZone did not appear for =
his sketch
plan conference.
The Board discussed the
request from the Town Board to review section 146-42D of the Town of
Attorney Wright told t=
he
Board that this comes to the Planning Board under the same section of the c=
ode
as rezoning requests. The Town
Board identifies a change it might want in the Zoning portion of the code a=
nd
they have to refer it to the Planning Board for a recommendation. The zoning in the Town is set up o=
n a
structure that starts with residential and goes up to Industrial zone. The Industrial zone is the least
restricted in the Town and you can do just about anything. In the 1990’s the Town creat=
ed a
new zoning category called Industrial Park zones. Industrial Park is different then
Industrial in that it has the largest setbacks in the code and it has all k=
inds
of restrictive requirements. =
The
other difference is that while all the other zoning is “step-up”
zoning, Industrial Park is not in that line. There could be support
industries. Mr. Wright did not
think you could have a support office, such as a marketing company.
Fred Santucci said tha=
t in
the Industrial Park in Busti there is a brewery that sells beer and sandwic=
hes. Mr. Wright said that is not in Ellicott and he cann=
ot
imagine that the County allows that.
Mr. Wright understands
that someone wants to do a retail sale out of one of the manufacturers. He asked Mr. Woodbury if he knew w=
ho it
was. Ron Calanni said that Bu=
sh
Industries has had sales. Dan=
said
that you don’t want to go into the Industrial Park and have someone
having a tent sale. Bush has =
moved
there sales to the
Paul said rather then
modifying the code itself to allow retail sales they could modify the code =
to
add them to be allowed with a Special Use Permit. Attorney Wright agreed they could =
amend
the code for Industrial Park districts to allow retail sales of goods produ=
ced
on site by Special Use Permit. Paul
suggested checking with the Town of
Steve Peterson said ma=
ybe
they could have some kind of eatery for the lunch hour crowd that works in =
the
Industrial Park.
Randy Woodbury stated =
that
Bloomquist Landscaping wants to buy property to relocate their business in =
the
Industrial Park. They would h=
ave
retail sales as well as their landscaping business. Randy said he suggested Bloomquist
Landscaping look at industrial property rather then the Industrial Park.
Mr. Evans said that any
retail sales in the Industrial Park should be an accessory to an existing
manufacturing business. Gary
Swanson read what the Town Council requested in the letter the Planning Boa=
rd
received. The Town Board requ=
ested
the Planning Board review section 146-42 D regarding permitted uses in
Industrial Parks. The Council=
is
concerned that the code might be too stringent; specifically it feels that
retail businesses i.e. commercial sales and service should not be precluded
from operating in Industrial Parks.
They were interested in the Planning Board’s opinion regarding
whether retail business should be allowed in Industrial Parks. The Town Board is actually asking =
for
service and retail sales. Randy said that the Town Board is thinking of
removing the conditional phrase “but not for the general public”=
; in
146-42 D to say you can have commercial sales and service. He had suggested 146-42 D stay the=
same
and add a section in 146-42 D “not to the general public unless a Spe=
cial
Use Permit is granted”. At
the time the Zoning Board of Appeals can only hear it as a Use Variance and=
he
did not think that the requirements under the State Law could not be met. Mr. Wright said that he had though=
t this
request was for one of the manufacturing businesses.
Attorney Wright said t=
hat
the Planning Board could recommend that incidental sales of manufactured on
site products be put it in as a Special Permit Use. The Board could direct =
the
Chairman and Attorney to write a provision and bring it back to the Board.<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> The Board has 60 days so they can
consider that at the next meeting. <=
/span>
Randy suggested that t=
he
Board invited the IDA to come in for the next meeting to talk about this. The Board decided that they should
invite the IDA to come in on April 2, 2008 at 6:30 PM to discuss where they
want to go with the Industrial Parks. Randy said he will contact the IDA. T=
he
Attorney and Chairman will wait to draft anything until the Board meets with
the IDA.
Motion made by Gary Swanson, seconded by Ron Cal=
anni
to table this request until the next meeting and get some input from the ID=
A.
Carried. =
&nb=
sp;
Ayes -6 &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp;
Noes – 0 =
&nb=
sp;
Absent – 1
Motion made by Steve Peterson, seconded by Gary
Swanson to adjourn the meeting at 10:02 PM.
Carried. =
&nb=
sp;
Ayes – 6 =
&nb=
sp;
Noes – 0 =
&nb=
sp;
Absent – 1
_______________________________
Valerie Pierce, Secret=
ary
|
PAGE=
265<=
!--[if supportFields]> |
|
PAGE=
349<=
!--[if supportFields]> |
|
|
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
(03/12/08)
– Regular Planning Board Minutes cont.