MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN OF ELLICOTT PLANNING BOARD HELD AT THE
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 215 SOUTH WORK ST., FALCONER, NY ON JULY 9, 2003 AT
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairman Dan Evans, Ron Calanni, Becky Holmstrom, Bob Pickett,
Dave Carlberg,
Attorney William Wright and
Code Enforcement Officer Randy
Woodbury.
ABSENT: Gary Swanson and Mike Mogenhan
Chairman
Evans called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
Motion made by Dave
Carlberg, seconded by Ron Calanni to approve the minutes
of the May 14, 2003 meeting.
Carried. Ayes-5 Noes-0 Absent-2
Fred LoFaso, agent
for Lamparelli Properties, Inc. reviewed new site plans for the
property at 944-956 Fairmount Ave.,
W.E., Jamestown, NY. Mr.
LoFaso told the Board that over the last month they had made changes to the
site plan. Since the approval of the
original site plan they have acquired the Holland’s property and want to put up
a second building. They have down sized
the first building to 2700 SF. They eliminated the Fairmount Avenue entrance
and added an entrance onto Wicks Avenue.
The applicant was granted several variances at the
June 30, 2003 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Discussion followed on:
1) lighting - there will be one pole light in the
parking lot and some lighting on the
building
2) sidewalks
– they will be concrete and paved – they are dealing with a grade change
and
will make the change in the grassed area
3) handicapped
parking – there will be one space for each building
4) Deliveries
– they will come into the front of the building
5) Sewer
tie-ins - they will tie into the
existing sewer and will comply with what the South and Center Sewer District
requires
6) Fences
and Dumpster
7) Elevations
– have to be shown on the plans
8) Hours
of operation – Mr, LoFaso stated he did not think they will be open beyond
11:00 PM or possibly 12:00 AM.
Mr. Evans asked if any neighbors had comments. No one spoke.
PLANNING BOARD
JULY 9, 2003
PAGE TWO
Mr. Evans asked who the tenants would be and Mr,
LoFaso said that he did not have signed deals with anyone yet.
Attorney Wright explained to the Board members that
the applicant had been granted three variances:
1) the
east side set back from front to back
would be reduced from 30 feet to 6.75 feet
2) the
front yard set back would be reduced
from 30 feet to 25 feet
3) the
west side set back would be reduced from 30 feet to 9 feet
These variances were granted on the plans that the
Zoning Board saw but those plans have been changed.
There was a discussion on the retaining wall and how
far from the neighbor’s property line it will be. Mr. LoFaso stated the wall is an average of 10 feet high and
approximately one foot from the property line.Mr. Woodbury said he overlooked
the height of the wall and any wall greater than 6 feet would require a
variance. Mr. LoFaso asked if would be
possible to eliminate the wall and grade back on the property. The Board
members agreed that that would not be feasible because it would create more
drainage problems.
Mr. Woodbury suggested that the applicant build the
15-foot wall and then grade against it so that over 9 feet would be
covered. He reminded Mr. LoFaso this
would be critical construction. Bob
Pickett asked about the safety fence above the wall that would be 5 feet. Mr. Woodbury stated that a safety fence on
top of the wall would not need a variance. Attorney Wright reviewed Section
146-70 of the code stating the wall must conform to the character of the
neighborhood. Mr. LoFaso said the fence
would be unilock system.
One owner will own both of these properties and the
second building will be leased. They
would like to start as soon as possible.
Attorney Wright asked Mr. Woodbury his opinion on
the fact that there had been so many changes since the approval of the setbacks
variances. Mr. Woodbury thought that Mr. LoFaso deserved a courtesy visit to
the Zoning Board to see if the members think this would change anything
concerning the variances.
Mr. LoFaso said he would try to get more green
spaces added to the plans. There was discussion on the required amounts of
green space – 12% overall and 5% within the interior of the parking lot.
Mr. Woodbury suggested that the 10-foot sidewalk
could be reduced to 5 feet and than they could use the other 5 feet for green
space. Mr. LoFaso said that would be shown on the new plans.
PLANNING BOARD
JULY 9, 2003
PAGE THREE
The members of the Board reviewed the site plan
checklist noting:
1) there
were no existing building shown on the plans
2) a
storm water study was provided but the Board would like Highway Superintendent
Shellhouse to review the drainage and decided if it should be reviewed by an
engineer.
3) no
elevations were shown on the plans
4) the
applicant will need to satisfy South and Center Sewer District for the Sewer
tie-in
5) fire hydrants are shown on the plans
6) signs
– the applicant would have to return to the ZBA if not in compliance
7) applicant
needs to bring in light schematics
8) the
planting schedule is shown on the plans
9) construction
schedule – 90 to 120 days from the start of the project
10) applicant needs a permit to work in the State
right-of-way to do the curbing
11) applicant was asked to plot any neighboring
permanent structures
12) contour intervals and DI’s need to be shown
on the plans
Mr. Evans reviewed the checklist items Mr. LoFaso
needed to complete the site plan review:
#7 Highway Superintendent will review the storm water study and he
will decide if it needs to be
reviewed by an engineer
#6 the design, elevations, type of construction and exterior of all
buildings must be shown
on the plans and the Board also needs the lighting schematics
#21 Plans should show the change
in the sidewalk - 5 % green space is
required in the
interior of the parking area
#24 a permit is required from the NYS DOT to work in the State
right-of-way
#26 applicant needs to show the neighboring property with all
permanent structures
#27 all topography and contour intervals must be shown on the plans
and the location of
the DI’s
Attorney Wright asked Mr. LoFaso to return to the
ZBA with the revised plans. The Board
also asked Mr. LoFaso to get the site plans to the Town as soon as possible.
Mr. Rick Piazza addressed
the Board concerning a revision to his approved site plan approval for the his
carpet store at 878 Fairmount Ave.,
W.E., Jamestown, NY. Mr.
Piazza needs to a certificate of occupancy to open and he has not completed the
site plan for this property. He
explained to the Board he lost his tenant for the second building.
The Board members reviewed the approved site plan
with Mr. Piazza. Mr. Evans asked if the site plans were complete. Mr. Piazza
said everything was done except for the second building being constructed.
Attorney Wright explained to the Board members that
Mr. Piazza could not get a certificate of occupancy before the site plans were
complete.
PLANNING BOARD
JULY 9, 2003
PAGE FOUR
Mr. Woodbury suggested the Board accept the revised
construction schedule. He stated he could write the conditions on the
certificate of occupancy. The Board did
not want to grant additional time if Mr. Piazza did not need it. He can return
to the Board if he does need additional time to complete the site plan as
approved.
Motion made by Bob
Pickett, seconded by Dave Carlberg to approve the modification to the site plan
to accept the construction schedule in phases. Phase 1 being completed and
Phase II to be completed in accordance with the original site plan.
Carried. Ayes-5 Noes-0 Absent-2
Elizabeth Nord asked
for a sketch plan conference. She wants
to live in and run a photography studio and ballet studio at property she
purchased on the corner of South Chicago and Woodworth Avenues.
Attorney Wright addressed the Board and told them
Ms. Nord had appeared before the Zoning Board and they had granted a special
use permit to operate the photography studio but there were still questions
concerning the ballet studio. He felt Ms. Nord needed a use variance instead of
the special use permit for a home occupation. He stated that the use variance
was very difficult to obtain. Mr. Woodbury told the Board that a use variance
would trigger a site plan review but the home occupation permit would not.
Ms. Nord told the members of the Board that she had
sent a survey around to the neighbors and they do not oppose the studios. She asked if she could downsize the classes
and start that way. Attorney Wright
explained that was not a question for the Planning Board.
The Chautauqua County Planning Board refused to help
Ms. Nord until she got ZBA approval.
Mr. Wright told Ms. Nord she did not need the County but would have to
get ZBA approval first and then determine if she needed to come to the Planning
Board.
Dana Riforgiato,
Eagle Forest Products, Inc., requested a sketch plan
conference for timber harvesting behind the Colony Motel on Fairmount Ave.,
W.E., Jamestown, NY. Mr. Woodbury told
the Board that timber harvesting could trigger site plan review.
Discussion followed on:
1) how
much land would be harvested – approximately 5 acres
2) where
the timber would be taken out – probably on Houston Avenue because there is not
enough room on the Colony Motel property
3) if
there were enough sizable trees – Mr. Riforgiato stated there were
4) Mr.
Riforgiato has had conversations with both highway superintendents - Celoron
would probably require a bond for
the street and Ellicott would require proof of insurance
PLANNING BOARD
JULY 9, 2003
PAGE FIVE
5) the
wooded area is flat and there is no running water on the property
6) they
would not harvest in the spring or late fall
7) project
could trigger a County review
The Board members determined that this project was
not subject to site plan review for this timber harvesting. They recommended
that Mr. Rigorgiato get a mailing list from the Town and notify the adjacent
home owners if they decide to harvest this timber.
Ron Calanni stated that he did have some concerns
with public safety and the children in the neighborhood. Mr. Rigorgiato told
the Board that they could harvest after school was in session.
Mr. Ted Winkelman, C
& R Construction, requested a sketch plan conference for M.A.C. Truck Parts for an addition to their
existing building on Peck-Settlement Rd., Jamestown, NY.
Mr. Winkelman reviewed the plans he had for the
Board members. The new addition will be 25’ X 108’ and will be used for
storage. It will not affect the
drainage. This will be a pre-fabricated building and is in an Industrial zone.
The applicant is asking the Board to waive the complete site plan review.
Becky Holmstrom asked the cost of the project and
Mr. Winkelman said it would be $50,000 to $60,000.
Attorney Wright review section 121-5 (Review
Requirements) and stated that any exterior alterations or additions to existing
structures that increase the square footage by more than 25% or cost more than
$15,000 need site plan review.
The Board determined this project would be subject
to site plan review and Mr. Woodbury will give Mr. Winkelman the checklist for
site plan review. He will make application for the August meeting.
Motion made by Bob
Pickett, seconded by Dave Carlberg to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 PM.
Carried. Ayes-5 Noes-0 Absent-2
____________________________
Valerie Pierce,
Secretary