MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN OF ELLICOTT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HELD AT THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 215 SOUTH WORK STREET, FALCONER, NY 14733 NOVEMBER 29, 2004 AT 7:30 P.M.

 

PRESENT: Chairman Steve Hoglin, Dave Remington, Kevin Saff,  Angelo Cimo,    

                     Patricia Martonis, Richard Keefer, Attorney William Wright, Code Enforcement Officer

                     Randy Woodbury and Secretary Valerie Pierce.

 

ABSENT:   John Merchant

 

Chairman Hoglin called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.  Secretary Pierce called the roll.

 

Motion made by Ang Cimo, seconded by Rick Keefer to approve the minutes of the September 27, 2004 meeting.

 

Carried.                      Ayes-6                         Noes-0                      Absent-1

 

Attorney Wright swore in everyone that would be testifying at this public hearing.

 

Chairman Hoglin reopened the public hearing for New York RSA No.3 Cellular Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless to renew their special use permit for the wireless tower west of Jamestown between Idlewood Drive and Orchard Road.

 

Robert Burgdorf, an attorney with the law firm Nixon Peabody, addressed the Board on behalf of Verizon Wireless. Sandra Brooks, the project manager and David Weisenreder, the civil engineer for Verizon Wireless were in attendance. 

 

Mr. Burgdorf gave a brief history of the special use permit and stated they had submitted the necessary information to the Town pursuant to the code. He understood that except for the drainage issue the materials were satisfactory.  The Town asked Verizon to investigate the drainage issue and try to determine the cause and to what extent that Verizon might be responsible.  They prepared, using the civil engineering firm of Costich Engineering, a drainage report and drainage improvements plan.  They found that they needed to do some remediation work that needed to be done.  One of the drainage culverts had been crushed and some of the drainage ditches were filled in.Verizon submitted the drainage improvement plan and they will perform the recommendations in the plan. They will return the flow to the pre-development flow.  The Town has indicated they might want to remediate even more than that but Verizon does not recognize any responsibility beyond the condition that existed before the construction.  They have agreed to help out.  Should the Town want to continue to investigate the drainage, Verizon has offered to pay for the civil engineering that would be involved in a drainage pond.  They hope to get the approval tonight because they are running out of time for the remediation work that needs to be done prior to the spring thaw. 

 

Mr. Burdorf asked if the Board had any questions.  Kevin Saff asked if there were problems before the pre-development conditions.  Attorney Wright said that Mr. Gerace stated at a prior meeting that the water flow on Idlewood Drive increased to the point of being a problem at the approximate time that

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE TWO

 

the tower was put in.  Kevin asked how the Town assisted in this.  David Weisenreder said there was a meeting between Verizon civil engineers and the Town engineer and the County engineer to look over the plan.  The remediation plan will take it back to pre-development levels.

 

Pat Martonis asked why the retention pond was not built.  Mr. Weisenreder said that the Town might want to build the pond but it would not be Verizon’s responsibility.  If the Town or residents want to go beyond that Verizon is willing to pay for the civil engineering. 

 

Discussion followed on the drainage, contours, water flow levels, the ravine, and the calculations. 

 

Mr. Woodbury said that the Town and County engineers had some reservations with this solution.  Mr. Weisenreder told them he had to solve the problem within the easement rights that Verizon has from Media One.  The pond would have had to be built on someone else’s property. Mr. Weisenreder had told Mr. Woodbury that if he were not constrained by available property he would build a detention pond just west of the north end of the Verizon driveway.  That is still a possibility if the Town talks to Media One and get them to donate some of that land to the Town and/or County.  Sandra Brooks said that Verizon had no rights to do improvements on someone else’s parcel but they could find a way to pay for the engineering services as an offer of good faith. That way they can contribute and not get involved in ownership.  Mr. Burdorf said that it is important to point out that the drainage pond is the Cadillac of jobs. The engineer’s conclusion is they can still return it within the easement area to pre-development levels.  Verizon would like to get this drainage plan started now.  The Geraces have received copies of the plans. 

 

Steve Hoglin asked what improvements above and beyond the culverts already in there would be proposed.  Mr. Weisenreder said that they are proposing regrading the drainage soil along the upgrade side; currently the culverts have been filled with sediment and are relatively shallow. They have rip rap line channels along the steeper sections to prevent erosion through those areas, the rip rap outlets sections on the culvert pipes to help dissipate the flow in storm water energy to help spread it out in to more sheet flow.  They picked up some of the drainage closer to the west end bringing it over to an existing drainage soil that is almost immediately north of the tower, trying to keep as much flow to the west as possible and away from the Idlewood Drive right-of-way. 

 

Sandra Brooks told the Board that the County was supposed to be helping maintain it as part of their agreement with Verizon but with snow removal and bad weather and co-locaters going up there with their equipment the trucks or snowplow goes off causing damage.  It needed to be replaced. Steve Hoglin asked if the culverts were being reinforced to take care of future truck traffic or heavy equipment.  Mr. Weisenrader said they could take a look at that. Steve asked about the elevation of the drain. Mr. Weisenreder showed the Board the contours on the plans.

 

 

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE THREE

 

Attorney Wright asked Mr. Burdorf what the level of commitment for the engineering would be.  Mr. Burdorf said that the quote from Costich Engineering was $4542.00 and Verizon is committed to that amount.  They would like a time limit on the commitment perhaps a year’s expiration. 

 

Attorney Wright said Mr. Woodbury recommended a one-year renewal (due again in July 2005) for this special use permit. That would put the Town in a better position to make a determination whether additional detention was needed.  Mr. Burdorf said that would depend what the end result would be.  If the levels were back to pre-development levels, Verizon would not see any responsibility for any flooding still occurring. Randy said he suggested a one-year permit to postpone some of the details and the application for July 2005 would be a regular application.  Meanwhile, the Board could continue to work on this drainage issue.  Ms. Brooks asked what the Town is planning to do for their part of the drainage.  She remembers that the neighbors thought it was part of the Town’s responsibility for the drainage. The county’s responsibility was to maintain the road.  She said Verizon has acted in good faith and are willing to do the improvements and are willing to pay over $4500 so the Town can pursue the pond.  She would like to get the two-year approval.  Mr. Woodbury said that he would be looking for a piece of land that someone would donate to the Town or County so they can build the retention pond.  Discussion followed on a one or two year permit. Ms. Brooks asked what if they made the offer for the engineering cost good for two years. The Board could make it a condition of the two-year approval to hold the money for two years.

 

Kevin Saff said the Board was really looking at an eighteen-month renewal at this point.  He had concerns about the maintenance.  Verizon does not have any problem with a condition that requires it be properly maintained. Kevin asked if there could still be a water problem even if the levels were at pre-development levels. Mr. Weisenreder said there could and they will look at other options.  Ang Cimo asked how they know the pre-development levels. Mr. Weisenreder explained how they figure the levels.  Ang Cimo asked if the culverts would be larger.  There will be six instead of three culverts and they will be 12 inches. 

 

There were no neighbors present.  Attorney Wright asked Rex Tolman, the Town engineer if he wanted to add anything.  Mr. Tolman said that he thought that they had agreed that this was not the design that would work.  The upstream culverts they have will do the same thing they are doing now.  There is no protection and the culverts will fill up.

 

Rick Keefer asked what the maintenance schedule is for Verizon. Ms. Brooks said she did not think it is a set schedule but done as needed.  David Weisenreder told Rex they were going to have rip rap at the end sections.  Rex said that would help but he feels it did not work well even before there was not good maintenance.  He does not think this is a good design for the area if you have to check it after every storm.   Ms. Brooks asked what they could do to improve the plan.  Mr. Woodbury asked about upsizing the pipes. Changing the 12” to a 24” pipe they could get four times the capacity at about the same cost.   Mr. Weisenreder said they would look at the watersheds that are tributary to each pipe and size them accordingly.  Mr. Tolman said he would like to see how the flow north of Orchard Road impacts this project.  Mr. Weisenreder said he would provide Mr. Tolman with the updated drainage

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE FOUR

 

calculations, which include the Orchard Road area.

 

Attorney Wright said because of the changes they should have a short form environmental form.

 

The Board continued with the next item on the agenda so that the applicant could fill out the short form EAF.

 

Chairman Hoglin reopened the application for the public hearing for Signs and Sales by Peterson for sign variances for Starbucks at 944-956 Fairmount Ave., W.E., Jamestown, NY 14701 on property owned by Lamparelli Properties, Inc.

 

The Town received a letter that advised them that Starbucks has been put on hold and they withdrew their application and requested a refund of the $200.00 fee. Attorney Wright said it is not the job of the ZBA to deal with fee issues.  The Town Board takes care of the fees.  The initial publications and mailings were done but the applicant has not appeared before the Board. He does not feel the ZBA needs to make any recommendation. 

 

Mr. Hoglin reopened the public hearing for The Rotary Club of Jamestown for a sign variance on property owned by Yaw Oil Co., Inc., on North Main Street Ext., Jamestown, NY. 

 

Mr. Mark Olson, representing the Rotary Club, told the Board they are interested building and donating to the City of Jamestown a “Welcome to Jamestown” sign.  They are looking for a centennial project and thought it would be a nice thing to promote the City as well as other areas outside the City.   There are still other obstacles but they would like the approval of the Town. The sign will be only about 10 feet from the City of Jamestown.  They had investigated and there is no place in the City of Jamestown for this sign.

 

Mr. Woodbury said the Board has to determine what kind of sign this is.  It might be considered an off-premises sign. Mr. Olson said they discussed this two months ago and there will be no advertising of any type on the sign.  There will be one number that people can call and they will be happy to make it just not-for-profit community events.  There will be no commercial advertising.

 

Ang Cimo asked the size of the sign.  Mr. Olson said the sign will not exceed the general dimensions that are on the application (16 feet long,  6 feet high and 2 feet wide).  They would turn the sign over to the City of Jamestown because they have agreed to maintain it.  Yaw Oil will grant a right-of-way agreement to the Rotary Club of Jamestown.

 

Pat Martonis asked about the problem with the possible new motel.  Mr. Olson said if the Patals put the motel there and want an access road they would have to remove the sign.  Pat feels that the sign would be advertising for other clubs. They would like to put the Rotary emblem on the sign but are willing to leave it off it is an issue.

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE FIVE

 

Rick Keefer asked if the Rotary has a standing before this Board. Attorney Wright stated the Town has a letter from Ted Bogdan, owner of the property on North Main Street Ext. stating there is a proposed right-of–way agreement. Rick asked if the application was sent to the County Planning.  Mr. Woodbury said he did not sent the application to the County but it just involves a phone call to the County Planning.  

 

Mr. Woodbury suggested Mr. Olson talk to the Town Board and partner with them. If Ted Bogdan grants an easement to the Town of Ellicott instead of the Rotary Club the Town could allow a sign to be built.  It could be a three-way partnership between the Town of Ellicott, the Rotary Club and the City of Jamestown.  Mr. Olson said he saw no advantage to the Town. Mr. Woodbury said that just defeated his solution. 

 

Attorney Wright went over the legal issues.  This application is for an area variance on Mr. Bogdan’s property due to the number of signs.  It comes in under section 146-67(4) E of the code which talks about permitted signs in mercantile and shopping districts.  There are already variances for the number of signs and the height and square footage of signs on this property.  If you go to the definition section of the code it describes off premises advertising as a service or activity that is offered or conducted elsewhere other than the premises upon which the sign is located.  Mr. Olson did not think this “Welcome to Jamestown” sign falls within those parameters.  Mr. Wright said the Board has to determine is if they are inclined to grant additional area variances for both the number and square footage for the parcel and they need to determine if this is an off-premises advertising sign.  Mr. Olson said they are not still sure they will put the sign there but they wanted to have things in place if they decide to spend the thousands of dollars it could take to construct the sign.  They have sized it back because of the possibility they might have to move the sign.  Attorney Wright stated section 146-67 (3) states that all signs not expressly permitted are prohibited.  Mr. Olson said the Rotary Club helps many different municipalities in southern Chautauqua County.  He hopes there is a 65% chance the sign will be put on this property but there are many obstacles. 

 

Pat Matronis asked if the Board already made Mr. Bodgan go from three signs to two. She cannot approve the Rotary Club emblem on the sign.  Mr. Olson said they were willing to leave the Rotary emblem or informational phone number off the sign. Mr. Olson said the  sign will be approximately 10 feet from the property line.

 

Chairman Hoglin requested a motion to approve or deny this application based on the determination if this is an off-premises advertising sign.  Attorney Wright stated the sections of code that are applicable are 146-67 (3) A, which talks about prohibited signs and then the definition of an off-premises sign under 146-66.

 

Mr. Olson said there is already a City of Jamestown sign located in the Town of Ellicott and did not know if there was an issue with that sign. Mr. Woodbury said that was a sign placed by the Department of Transportation within their right-of-way and not subject to the Town’s jurisdiction.  Attorney Wright said there are exempt signs under the Town code.

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE SIX

 

Mr. Olson said there is no commercial gain for anyone and it helps the community overall.   

 

Motion made by Pat Martonis, seconded by Dave Remington not to approve this application on the basis it is an off-premises advertising sign. She feels it is advertising the City of Jamestown. 

 

Carried.                    Ayes-4                 Noes-2 (Saff and Cimo)              Absent-1

 

Chairman Hoglin returned to the application for Verizon.  

 

Attorney Burdorf said the short form EAF had been completed and they want to offer potential conditions that would take into account the Town engineer’s concerns. 

 

The potential conditions are:

1)    Verizon Wireless implement the drainage improvement plan as submitted to the Town with      

                   the following additions

a)     the pipes be an 18 inch minimum and perhaps larger if water shed warrants ( this would be at the discretion of the Town engineer)

b)    the plan be modified so that pipe # 3 coming up Idlewood (that collects the bulk of the water) definitely be 24 inches and have a trash rack

2)    regular maintenance be preformed to keep the newly implemented  system as designed

3)    the engineering condition as e-mailed to the Town attorney be changed  from one year to two years.

 

The Board continued with the short form EAF.  Attorney Wright stated this project does not exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.4 and will not receive coordinated review. 

 

The Board reviewed Part II C noting:

1)    the primary intention of the action is to resolve drainage and flooding problems

2)    this project will not have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the     

      establishment of a critical environmental area.

3)    there could likely be controversy related to the potential adverse environmental impacts if   

                  the conditions are not met

 

Motion made by Rick Keefer seconded by Kevin Saff declaring the action will not cause a significant adverse environmental impact and authorizing Chairman Hoglin to sign the form on behalf of the Board. 

 

Carried.                       Ayes-6                      Noes-0                   Absent-1

 

Motion made by Kevin Saff, seconded by Rick Keefer to approve the renewal of the special use permit for Verizon Wireless to expire July 2006 with the conditions listed above.

 

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE SEVEN

 

Carried.                             Ayes-6                               Noes-0                           Absent-1

 

Chairman Hoglin opened the public hearing for Gerald A. & Lois S. McConnell, 60 School St., W.E., Jamestown, NY for a special use permit for a home occupation. 

 

Mr. McConnell told the Board they operate a home-based business for Echo Quest.  It is similar to Shakee or Pampered Chef or Avon.  Their product (air and water purifiers, vitamins and enzymes) is for improving the health of the person.  Most of their business is done over the phone or occasional parties at their home.  There is no signage except for a magnetic sign on his car.  They have a small office space in their home with a computer and have some products displayed.  They do not bring people in as a general rule to show them their products.  They will take the unit out and display it for about seven days. 

 

Mr. Hoglin asked Mr. Woodbury for some history.  Randy said that his opinion was this is a home occupation based on the code.  He found out about the business from a newspaper announcement that the McConnells were to receive some award and the address for the business was listed as School Avenue.  He called and told them they needed some action of the Zoning Board.  It was his understanding that they understood the process, the reason why and that they were willing to apply for the special use permit. 

 

Attorney Wright asked if he had made a home visit.  Mr. Woodbury said he has not for this instance but would like to see the home office.  Mr. McConnell stated there is not any part of the home that is designated strictly to this business. There would be 5 to 10 people at their occasional home parties.  There would be no more cars then for any other meeting at their house.  Their products promote their business, Solutions for a Healthy Living.   They have been involved with this business for three years and have not had more than two or three parties.  Rick Keefer asked if there was anyone else running the business out of his or her home.  There will not be any other people running the business.   The office space is 68” x 68”.  Ang Cimo asked if they store the products.  They stated they do not keep a big inventory because they get them delivered within a week. They have products delivered UPS once or twice a month. 

 

Kevin Saff told the McConnells that the Board received a letter that has been signed by 24 residents of School Ave.  He wanted to know what would cause 24 neighbors to sign a letter that they would not like this home occupation. 

 

Mrs. McConnell stated that Echo Quest is a national company and a top company with air and water purification. The only way they sell is a home-based business and there are thousands of people across the country selling Echo Quest.  It is not a storefront business.  Mrs. McConnell does not understand why people that sell Pampered Chef or Avon do not have to get a home occupation permit.

 

Al Suchar, 26 School Ave., W.E., Jamestown, NY, addressed the Board and said he was alarmed because they wanted to run a home office.  Their history in the neighborhood of doing things that upset

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE EIGHT

other neighbors is well documented.  The neighbors signed a petition to attest to that.  They do not want any kind of business in the neighborhood.  Their primary concern is the frequency of vehicles that would be in the area.  When the McConnells ran their garage sales, that were quite frequent, the neighborhood was filled with vehicles and it posed quite a problem. They are afraid that is going to reoccur with this business.  Mr. Suchar said he believes that the office space is small but the garage is full of product that adds to the home office usage.  He feels they are using more than 25% or 500 square feet. 

 

Mrs. McConnell said they have lived on School Avenue for 29 years and at the most have had 2 garage sales a year.  This past summer they did not have any garage sales.  Attorney Wright said this is not about garage sales and will direct the Board not to consider anything regarding garage sales.  This hearing is about the home occupation.

 

Ken Lasker, 49 School Ave., W.E., Jamestown, NY, stated he lives across the street and diagonally from the McConnells.  He said that only reason Mr. Suchar brought up the garage sale issue is an issue of credibility.  He has lived in the neighborhood for 12 years and it is a terrific neighborhood with a large number of children living there.  Generally all the neighbors get along great and this is a tight community.  It is a great area to raise a family.  They moved there because they wanted a quite street to raise their kids.  The only reason the McConnells are not having garage sales is because the Town put a stop to them.  It was not an easy thing to stop.  When the neighbors got the notice for this hearing people were upset.  They do not want to have businesses or home occupation business on School Avenue.  They do not want extra traffic. People are upset because of the history and they do not want to establish a precedent on that street to allow a home occupation. Mr. Lasker said that they are operating without a permit. Mr. Lasker stated that the only reason this came about is because of an ad in the paper that listed their home address as the business address.  He does not know what this Board’s position is if people are in violation of code.  The neighborhood is united in not wanting to open this door and allow a home business on School Avenue. 

 

Attorney Wright asked Mr. Lasker if the first time he learned of this activity going on in the house was the ad in the paper and when he received notice from the Town for the Zoning Board.  He asked if he could tell before receiving the notice that they were conducting a home occupation.  Mr. Lasker said there always seem to be more cars than usual in their driveway and when the garage door is up there are always boxes piled up.

 

John Johnson, Homestead Ave., W.E., Jamestown, NY, does not feel they need a home occupation in this neighborhood.  He would like to see a stop to this before there are others that want home occupation businesses in the neighborhood.  

 

Evelyn Suchar, 26 School Ave., W.E., Jamestown, NY, has raised two children on the street and always felt comfortable that they could play in the neighborhood.  She feels that the business will increase the traffic on the street. The traffic is predictable for the most part.  If you have business traffic you introduce a whole new element into the neighborhood with people who are not from the area.

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE NINE

 

They had a break-in at their house a few years ago.  If you introduce outside traffic you show them a neighborhood that has possessions that are worth checking out.  She reiterated what the others have said about past history. She has questions about the products, how many there are. She feels it was dishonest not calling the neighbors and telling them what they are doing and ask how they feel about it.

 

Mr. McConnell asked if they were selling Avon would they be here.  They are not going to get more than two trucks a month.  The neighbors refer to the garage sales and Mr. McConnell stated it is an absolute lie that they had more than two at a time for two days each, one in the spring and one in the fall. They did have some flea market stuff.  The code enforcement officer (before Randy) came out and checked out the garage sales and did not see a problem with them.  They did not know they were doing anything wrong.  When Randy brought up they were doing something wrong, they talked to a lawyer and reached an agreement that as long as they did it in conjunction with the street sale it was not a problem. They were concerned with the traffic.

 

Mrs. McConnell said she feels their names are being besmirched.  Mr. McConnell said they did not know they needed a permit.  They know of eight or nine people in West Ellicott that are Echo Quest dealers.  They must also be in violation.

 

Pat Martonis said that she would like to see this tabled until next month and have Randy go out and check the site.  Ang Cimo asked if this is the McConnells only income.  They are retired teachers and enjoy selling and feel that are doing a service because of the product that they sell.  That is why they list their business as “Solutions for Healthy Living”.

 

Attorney Wright said he would review the code unless Pat wanted to ask the Board to move her issue and have Randy get additional information then there would be no reason to go over the code.  However, in going over the code part of it is requirements for square footage and whatever.  Pat would like the applicant to come back to the next meeting with records that would show deliveries and that would clear up that issue. 

 

Motion made by Pat Martonis, seconded by Rick Keefer to table this application until the next meeting for a visit by Randy Woodbury and more information from the McConnells. 

 

Mr. Lasker wanted to make a comment that the McConnells have made a lot of comments that were flat out not true and he suggested the Board talk to Randy Woodbury about what these people have done at this house.  They have tried to run a business for a decade and the Town finally shut it down.  They have run a business out of their home and he cannot speak forcefully enough to ask the Board to deny this tonight.  The neighborhood is universally opposed to these people running a business out of their house.  There is no support.  Everyone is upset and delaying it, if that is what the Board chooses to do, he is not sure everyone is going to come back again.  He wants it on the record that people are really upset about this.  He asked the Board to please deny this.

 

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE TEN

Mrs. McConnell said that the letter did not say they were applying for Echo Quest so that was the reason the neighbors were upset.  They have only been retired for seven years and were retired a year or two before they started their flea market so it has not been a decade.  They have not been doing the flea market or garage sales.  She has had calls that the whole neighborhood was not against this.  Attorney Wright said if this were tabled they would have an opportunity to contact those neighbors. 

 

Mr. Woodbury said since this motion involved him he informed the Board that the 27th of December and the 3rd of January are Town holidays.  He will not be here on the 20th of December. He thought if he needed to give the Board members a report he should be here.  Ang Cimo said he had not heard from the neighbors if there is an issue with parking on the street.  Mr. Suchar said that was an issue in the past but it goes back to the garage sales.  When you have large vehicles delivering it limits severely what you can do. Mr. Suchar strongly urged the Board to consider section 146-64 B and C in their decision as well as section 146-71 A. 

 

Mr. McConnell admitted they did put flea market stuff with their garage sale but did not know that was doing anything wrong.  He said that no one would have known they were doing anything with Echo Quest except for what was in the paper. 

 

Rick Keefer said he would like to get the information from Randy before they make a decision.  Mr. Suchar said they should cease the business until the Board makes a decision.  Mrs. McConnell feels that if they are asked to stop then the Town is discriminating against them.  There are a lot of people in West Ellicott as well as people in Frewsburg.  Attorney Wright said they are welcome to turn in anyone in the Town of Ellicott if they want to.  It is their desecration.  Mrs. McConnell said she would not do that.

 

Carried.                        Ayes-6                   Noes-0                    Absent-1

 

Mr. Lasker asked if the neighbors would be notified of the new date for the meeting.  They would not normally be notified again.  He asked if Mr. Suchar could be notified as to when the next meeting will be.  The Town Clerks office will notify Mr. Suchar.

 

Kevin Saff asked how many residents occupy School Avenue.  On the notification list there were 21 residents on School Avenue. 

 

Dave Remington wanted to say you cannot compare other municipalities with Town of Ellicott.  They have different laws and zoning laws.  Other people in the Town of Ellicott who have come for home occupations follow the guide lines of the Board with regards to the % of the home and restricted parking. The Board is just following the code. Mrs. McConnell checked on the Internet to see if anyone has been in for a home occupation for Echo Quest, Avon or Pampered Chef.  She found no one. 

 

Carl Baggiano, 50 School Avenue, Jamestown, NY, stated that the  garage is full and they have two cars that are in their driveway and wanted to know how can anybody else park in their driveway. 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE ELEVEN

Chairman Hoglin said he has a motion and second to table so he wanted a vote.

 

Carried.                   Ayes-6                          Noes-0                     Absent-1

 

The Board still has to determine when the next meeting will be.

 

The Zoning Board took a brief break at 10:00 P.M. 

 

Chairman Hoglin opened the public hearing for J. B. Crosby for a special use permit for a home occupation in his home at 2327 Camay Lane, Jamestown, NY.

 

Mr. Crosby said he has filed with the County for a business permit to start a business out of his home. He gave the Board a brief background history and told them his business is PC Projects.  It includes digital archiving, creative projects and other computing services. He has a home office of about 100 square feet. He intents to make house calls to clients but may have occasional client come to the house.  He has a long driveway and parking in the front of the 2 ½ garage and in the turn around drive. His house sits in the middle of 2 acres so the house is on a hill and there will be no on street parking.  He has talked to a couple of neighbors since the notices went out and has not heard about any issue with the neighbors.  He would doubt they would even know there is a business going on.  He does not anticipate any increase of traffic flow of any kind.  He provided brochures for the Board to look at.  He will be the only one running the business.  He does not have any signage and will comply with the code if he does put up a sign.   He will advertise in the Penny Saver and Post Journal.  If it grows he will move to a storefront.  He will not sell any items except custom-made items.

 

Rick Keefer asked how he found out he needed a special use permit.  Mr. Crosby said that in his  business reading  it said to check with your Town.  When he checked with Randy he found out he needed a special use permit.  There were no comments from neighbors.

 

Attorney Wright reviewed the requirements under section 146-64 C, which sets the standards and section 146-5 (definition) and section 146-71 A that limits home occupations to customary uses and ones that will be conducted exclusively by persons residing in the dwelling. It cannot occupy more than 25% of the total dwelling space for 500 square feet.  The Board must determine if the use do or does not fit within the home occupation and the Board has the authority to impose whatever conditions that they determine would be meaningful in order to make a home occupation fit within the code. 

 

Motion made by Dave Remington, seconded by Pat Martonis to approve the application of J.B. Crosby, 2327 Camay Lane, Jamestown, NY for a special use permit as outlined by the Board for two years. 

 

Carried.                            Ayes-6                          Noes-0                        Absent-1

 

Mr. Woodbury tries to remember to notify the applicant but the applicant has the burden to come in for the renewal.

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE TWELVE

 

Chairman Hoglin opened the public hearing for H.H. Rauh Paving, Inc. for a fence at 2209 Allen Street6 Ext., Falconer, NY. 

 

Attorney Wright briefed the Board that the Planning Board has been working H.H. Rauh a/k/a Kingsview for several months on the permit approval for a asphalt plant which will be located on the corner of Allen and Dow Streets (the old Sterlingworth site).  The Planning Board picked up on that the fence will be 10 feet high and the code limits the height of fences in the Town to 6 feet without a variance.  They want a 10-foot chain link fence with a security wire on top. Mr. Rex Tolman, engineer for the project, stated it will have 2 strands of wire on top. The Planning Board advised them they would need Zoning Board approval for an area variance to construct the fence.

 

Mr. Woodbury said the code also requires the fence be in the character of the neighborhood.  He determined that 2 strands of barbed wire in an industrial zone met with the character of the neighborhood.

 

Mr. Tolman showed the Zoning Board members plans of the site and reviewed the project with them. He told the Board the fence is for security because they are a non-union contractor.   The fence will be  around the whole site.  The fence is a standard chain link fence with sliding gates ten feet high with 2 strands of barbed wire.

 

Attorney Wright stated that taking the fence from 6 to 10 feet requires an area variance under 267 B of the Town Law.  It is the balancing test with the five criteria that weights the benefit of the applicant as opposed to the determent of the health, safety and welfare of the community as a whole.  He reviewed the five criteria for the Board under 267 (B) 3. The area variance is exempt under SEQR.  

 

Kevin Saff asked if the barbed wire is concertina wire.  Mr. Tolman said it is just barbed wire. This is a safety issue as well. They do not want kids running in there.  The fence towers 30 feet off the ground.  Kevin Saff asked why the concrete plant next to it does not need a fence. Mr. Woodbury said because of the more competitive nature of their business a security fence was added. 

 

Mr. Hoglin said the only condition he would like to add is that it would be maintained. 

 

Kevin Saff asked if this is a seasonal operation.  Mr. Tolman said they anticipate 180 days of operation a year.   Attorney Wright asked if they had their DEC permit.  Mr. Tolman said it had been publicly noticed about three weeks so they have another week for the 30-day waiting period. 

 

Motion made by Ang Cimo, seconded by Rick Keefer to approve H.H. Rauh, 2209 Allen St. Ext., Falconer, NY to construct a 10 foot fence exceeding the 6 foot limit. 

 

Carried.                           Ayes-5                          Noes-1 (Saff)                   Absent-0

 

 

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NOVEMBER 29, 2004

PAGE THIRTEEN

 

Motion made by Rick Keefer, seconded by Dave Remington to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 P.M.

 

Carried.                               Ayes-6                                 Noes-0                          Absent-1

 

 

 

_______________________________________

Valerie Pierce, Secretary